I'm not personally familiar with R/C stuff, but it seems that some of the car/truck ones I have seen would probably take the extra weight better than anything that flies. A helicopter would indeed be better for warflying, because just hovering up high in a populated area would be better than flying past it. Scanning the wifi channels takes a few seconds, and even in a car at 50 mph you will lose some fringe ones. Multi-antenna and multi-interface rigs don't have this problem, but that won't be in a R/C vehicle.
One of my co-workers builds R/C jets from scratch (!). He builds the molds by hand, lays the fiberglass, builds every little piece except the radio control part. They weigh 53 pounds, and will fly 200 mph. Of course line of sight goes away pretty quickly with speeds like that. He has been doing this for ten years and he would qualify as an expert. I asked him, he said his jets could carry an extra few pounds of payload, but consumer R/C flying devices cannot carry much. There are R/C helicopters designed to carry cameras, but he said they are over USD $1000.
There are two control channels (in the USA anyway), 72 mhz and 2.4 ghz.
While the controllers are very sophisticated on scanning all the available channels and picking an empty one, there are potential problems. If you use Netstumbler, it transmits on every channel. Even though they are on adjacent channels,
desense can be your problem just from being physically close to it. Ham radio guys that work with repeaters know this term very well. Desense from Netstumbler could possibly overwhelm your control channel. This means you crash wherever it is.
Have you wardriven much? Using a car/bike/walking is a lot of fun as it is.
EDIT: My jet-freak friend does not build the engines either, he buys those.